About biotechnology application, Biotech Summit Advisory Board

Sports / Entertainment


CLONED MEAT?? Is the FDA Serious! Who wants to eat this?

Posted on April 01, 2011 by admin


Does anyone really want the future of meat production to take place in corporate controlled laboratories? Seriously, what was the FDA thinking when they approved cloned animals? This video has been rebroadcast with permission from Underground Wellness @ www.youtube.com oz oprah greene vegan vegetarian meat food and drug

25 to “CLONED MEAT?? Is the FDA Serious! Who wants to eat this?”

  1. datzfast says:

    so you take a non sex cell form say the greatest cow in the world and you make millions of new cows just like the one great one. in other word its identical twin.
    well i supose that might catch on. in fact the government might even say its ok to eat them, who knows.

  2. cathavenfostermom1 says:

    Wow, I work with clones so I understand perfectly what
    you are talking about Sean.
    Clones aren’t always the healthiest animals
    and I’ve been told that one scientist who cloned a bunch of endangered
    lizards walked into his office one morning to find them all dead for no reason.
    I love my little goats but they are freaks that should not enter the food chain!

  3. donnyab says:

    Keep these greedy yanks and their fucked up ideas out of Europe….no GM food and no cloned animals

  4. Dimfe says:

    Great point. join this facebook group and have your say: Over 1 Billion people against Cloned and Genetically Modified (GM) foods

  5. 1aaronaaron1 says:

    *raises hand*

  6. nataliewheeleryo says:

    I personally don’t mind eating cloned meat, but that fact that the fda isnt requiring labels put on these meats is wrong because some people do mind!

  7. JoshuaRamires says:

    you mean Byron Richards ?

  8. PaulChekLive says:

    Its pretty simple really…. cows naturally eat grass and live most efficient lives under conditions where the grass is good and plentyful. Cloned meat will be grown in a nutrient solution and w ill never be able to have the true nutrient profile of the wild cow. Studies have shown the effects of altered diets on the nutritive qualities. Besides adopting this will shift production away from small local farmers toward multinationals. Not to mention the will be heightened use of chemicals as well

  9. TheFluffyDuck says:

    Whats wrong with Cloned meat?

    Absolutely nothing! The one and ONLY correct answer. Thanks for playing.

    No amount of anticapitlist, green fear mongering ideology will change the science on this.

  10. NorthCentralMass says:

    HFCS may contain mercury? Wow, thats interesting

  11. 0oz says:

    Oh sorry, by the first 30 seconds I thought the man was against clone food in general.

  12. PaulChekLive says:

    The issue here is if we are willing to let massive multinationals decide where, how and how much our food costs, as well as the actual nutritive quality.

    the only way to create some level of equality in this world is to keep food production diversified, customized to niche environments and generally a good career for the masses. Otherwise you end up with food monopolies, food for profit first, etc.

  13. PaulChekLive says:

    I think you are missing the whole point. We dont have problems breeding farm animals, never have, never will. This is an issue of corporate control of food, associated food technology (cause only industrial food production requires this technology of these kind to mitigate its own shortfalls) and the control of food markets from central locations (such as board rooms).

  14. 0oz says:

    Wait a good minute here. Aren’t clones created by just nothing more than a whole cell from a donor mixed with an egg cell and placed in a surrogate? How is this different or harmful from anything else if the meat is well, the same from the donor that was not a clone?

    Can you please tell me that the meat from Clones are more dangerous/unhealthy such as a higher uhhh. toxins or whatever? And that you got that information from a reliable source? Cause Rhetoric isn’t convincing.

  15. harpermd says:

    You are correct you make me laugh. thanks.

  16. r6uocs says:

    I’m the big moron that is highly skeptical who have done real research instead of reading some bullshit off the internet and NOT buying propaganda. Have fun.

  17. footboydl says:

    Are you fucking serious? HFCS dangers propaganda from organic people? How big of a moron can you really be? I’ve done my research pal and that’s why I can talk iontelligently about this horrible poison. If you did your research instead of making idiotic posts like the one above, you’d know that there are several differences in the way HFCS is digested and processed that make it harmful as well as the fact that it has been proven to contain mercury. Now go play in traffic!

  18. r6uocs says:

    Well, to attack HFCS is a huge propaganda scheme by organic people. Calling each other names and blablabla is just all personal opinions. HFCS is just concentrated sugar. Tampering with the laws of nature is wrong and dangerous, OK Caveman… Alright, go do your own real research then come talk like you’re smart. Peace.

  19. footboydl says:

    As for GMF and nutritional loss, the clone is an immitation, and can’t have the same nutritional properties as the real thing. You can read many articles on this subject as well, and not only meats but fruits and vegetables as well. Tampering with the laws of nature is wrong and dangerous. BTW, everything didn’t used to be chemicals, just the last 30 or so years and disease has risen steadily with each new abomination they add into our food.

  20. footboydl says:

    Human self indulgence? I DARE you to avoid HFCS and hundreds of unhealthy food additives unless you’re wealthy enough to eat totally organic. As for proof that HFCS is dangerous, you can do a google search on the subject and you’ll find plenty of studies that support my beliefs. Also in all the propaganda ads for HFCS made by the CRA, they portray people who oppose HFCS as inarticulate morons..

  21. r6uocs says:

    Ha, you’re a funny guy. How does GMF cause nutritional loss? Enlighten me.
    You think that’s why we have disease in epidemic proportions now? Come on man. Epidemics is not a new subject, and most likely is due to evolution, since microbes have much quicker generation times.
    HFCS, food additives, chemicals… chemicals? Everything is chemical. The reason why HFCS and food additives can be harmful it’s not because it’s genetically modified, but because of human self-indulgence.

  22. footboydl says:

    No, I don’t feel violated because you went through the trouble to find out that I enjoy the foot videos. I like female feet! Yee hah! Now, back to the subject at hand, you obviously don’t understand the nutritional loss that results from genetically modified food. Science is not better than nature. That’d why wehave disease in epidemic propoprtions now. Man made sugars (HFCS), gmf, food additives, chemicals. This just takes this crap one step further. Your wisdom’s not as infinite as you think.

  23. r6uocs says:

    So tell me, why does my infinite wisdom have anything to do with your choice of eating anything? What do you mean by you “can’t afford to eat fake ass meat” ? Well, because of our limited intelligence… EVERYONE IS STILL ALIVE! BOOOooo!
    Now, go have fun with those foot videos. I bet all those people rub cream made from “fake ass” plants and animals. Don’t you feel violated now?

  24. footboydl says:

    Bingo!

  25. r6uocs says:

    You talking to me?






↑ Top

Powered by Yahoo! Answers